![]() |
![]() |
Links
RSS Feedarchives
|
Friday, February 08, 2008Is Brown the New Yellow?
I have been saying for many years now that the continuing financial success of the yellow pages industry is due more to inertia than innovation. The only reason the industry hasn't followed the rapid downward spiral of the newspaper industry is its huge market momentum and unusual business model which provides strong competitive defenses. But as we all well know, the Internet has a funny habit of trashing old business models while simultaneously leveling the competitive playing field.
The sublime magic of yellow pages has always been that the advertising is the content. The layer of free content that yellow pages provide is a thin one indeed. Once a yellow pages directory reaches a critical mass of advertising, there's enough content to make it useful to consumers, spurring rapid user adoption. And with rapid user adoption, there is the opportunity to charge a lot more for advertising, something yellow pages publishers do with gusto. As I said: an incredible business model. But it's not a model you can expand too quickly on a geographic basis, because as you scale, getting a critical mass of advertising becomes harder. At the same time, adding high value content or social networking features isn't a simple alternative. That's because as you add more information about businesses, you decrease their interest in advertising. And advertisers paying thousands of dollars a year haven't shown much interest in ratings or customer comments that they can't control. Some publishers, such as Zagat and Angie's List, have attempted to flip the model by charging consumers for access to deep and unbiased information on businesses generated by consumers. It's a viable model, but such products are hard to build and grow slowly. That's why I was intrigued to read the launch announcement for a UK-based online yellow pages called The Brownbook. It's a wiki- based yellow pages. Brownbook supplies the same thin content layer found in all yellow pages (business name, address, phone, business category), then encourages users to add comments and reviews to business listings. Businesses are encouraged to maintain their own listings, and can add a wealth of supplemental information for a modest fee. To get around advertiser's traditional distaste for user comments and ratings, Brownbook neatly addresses the issue by turning it into a marketing opportunity for businesses: burnish your image by resolving negative comments and other issues right on the site, proof of your concern and responsiveness. It's an innovative approach Brownbook can afford to take as a start-up. Scaling issues still exist (Brownbook offers national coverage), but they are less daunting than for a traditional yellow pages. Brownbook has a tremendous amount of work in front of it to simultaneously build audience and a base of advertisers. That said, the business model is fresh, interesting and well executed. I might go so far as to say it's exciting -- a word rarely used in the same sentence as yellow pages. Labels: angie's list, brownbook, thebrownbook, yellow pages, zagat
Comments:
Interesting site, especially when compared with a similar UK venture, Bizwiki (www.bizwiki.co.uk). Both sites provide the basic framework of a general yellow pages directory, and rely on users and businesses to fill in the rest. I'm somewhat partial to the Bizwiki execution, which to my eye presents a more intuitive and useful interface than Brownbook's Web 2.0 cliches (e.g. the completely useless category tag cloud, currently dominated by "Unisex Hairdresser"). Regardless, both sites have their work cut out for them.
I’m part of the team working on Bizwiki so thanks for the comparison, Hugh. I absolutely agree with Russell’s article, the amount of information available from traditional ‘yellow pages’ publishers is generally very thin, and there is a demand for more depth –particularly from internet users.
The challenge in the wiki-based model is of both building up the audience size that will help generate the additional depth of content, and of building up enough additional content to attract the audience. It can sound a bit like ‘the chicken and the egg’ riddle, but fortunately we’ve been very happy with the speed our user base has been growing, with almost three thousand people signed up to edit and add records already and more joining every day. It’s probably worth mentioning that businesses are invited to sign up and maintain listings on Bizwiki without the fee that Russell mentioned Brown Books charges, which I will admit probably makes our approach easier! Good luck to them, though, there is obviously increasing demand for something beyond the basic address details about companies online. As a final note, work is already in progress on Bizwiki.com, the Business Wiki for the US.
An interesting space indeed and one that we will enter next month with www.wecando.biz. Ours has a twist though - it exploits the medium of social networking to spread usage and ensure that the recommendations are more relevant. There are a few companies entering this space, a few still who have been in it for a while, and it will take a lot to illustrate value over Yell, Scoot and Applegate, all of whom win on the sheer number of businesses listed. The ultimate winner will be the one that lists the most businesses and with the most valuable information attached. We look forward to the fight!
Post a Comment
Ian Hendry WeCanDo.BIZ www.wecando.biz Links to this post: << Home |